Recibido: 2017-01-29 / Aceptado: 2017-03-23

El impacto de la movilidad cognitiva y los medios de información en la participación política de los mexicanos

Alejandro Pastrana Valls

DOI: 10.7764/cdi.40.1096

Resumen


Este documento se centra en analizar el efecto que tiene la movilidad cognitiva en el comportamiento político y su influencia sobre la decisión de voto del votante mexicano. Investiga el impacto de los medios tradicionales y los nuevos medios de comunicación en la opción de voto del electorado. Además, analiza el efecto tanto de la movilidad cognitiva como de los medios de comunicación sobre los ciudadanos, dependiendo de la generación a la que pertenecen. La variable de movilidad cognitiva es generada a partir de modelos exploratorios y confirmatorios. Las hipótesis son probadas generando modelos logit y logit por multigrupos.

Palabras clave


redes sociales; medios tradicionales; movilidad cognitiva; voto y decisión de voto

Como citar Pastrana Valls, A. (2017). El impacto de la movilidad cognitiva y los medios de información en la participación política de los mexicanos. Cuadernos.Info, (40), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.40.1096

Referencias

  1. Aceves, F. J. (2004). Monitoreo de medios y democratización en América Latina. La participación ciudadana en la vigilancia de la función informativa de los medios de comunicación de masas [Media Monitoring and democratization in Latin America. The citizen participation in the monitoring of the role of the mass media communication]. Comunicación y Sociedad, (1), 91-108. Retrieved from http://revistascientificas.udg.mx/index.php/comsoc/article/view/4234
  2. Alcalde, V. J. (2003). Medios de comunicación como intermediarios del voto: la influencia de TV1 y Antena 3 en las elecciones legislativas de 1993 [Media as intermediaries of the vote: the influence of TV1 and Antena 3 in the legislative elections of 1993]. Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (104), 145-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184572
  3. Barredo, D., Arcila, C., Arroyave, J. & Silva, R. (2015). Influence of social networks in the decision to vote: An exploratory survey of the Ecuadorian electorate. International Journal of E-Politics, 64(4), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2015100102
  4. Bartels, L. M. & Brady, H. E. (1993). The state of quantitative political methodology. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II (pp. 121-159). Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.
  5. Bennett, W. L. & Entman, R. M. (Eds.). (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
  7. Berelson, B, Lazarsfeld, P. & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Bernal Triviño, A. (2015). Tecnología, redes sociales, política y periodismo. ¿Pluralidad informativa o efecto bumerán? [Technology, social networks, politics and journalism: Plurality or boomerang effect?]. Cuadernos.Info, (36), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.36.647
  9. Blais, A. (2000). To vote or note to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Espacio social y génesis de las clases [Social space and genesis of the classes], In Sociología y cultura (pp. 282-283). México, D.F.: Grijalbo. Retrieved from https://existenciaintempestiva.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/bourdieu-sociologia-y-cultura.pdf
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Las formas del capital. Capital económico, capital cultural y capital social [The forms of capital. Economic capital, cultural capital and social capital]. In Poder, derecho y clases sociales (pp. 132-133). Bilbao: Editorial Desclée de Brouwer.
  12. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  13. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Cappella J. N., Price, V. & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246498
  15. Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S. M. & Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), 340-358. Retrieved from http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2012/DEMM-2012_019wp.pdf
  16. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, Boston, London: Little, Brown and Company.
  17. Cisneros, I. (2016). El perfil del votante anulista en la elección federal de 2009 en México: independencia partidista y movilidad cognitiva [Null voter profile in the 2009 midterm federal election in Mexico: Non-party and cognitive mobility]. Colombia Internacional, (86), 51-80. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint86.2016.02
  18. Citron, D. K. (2010). Fulfilling government 2.0’s promise with robust privacy protections. Arguendo, The George Washington Law Review, 78(4), 822-845. Retrieved from http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/78_4_Citron.pdf
  19. Cogburn, D. & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
  20. Crovi, D., Toussaint, F. & Tovar, A. (2006). Periodismo digital en México [Digital journalism in Mexico]. Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  21. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and oppostition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  22. Dalton, R. J (2000). The decline of party identification. In R.J. Dalton & M.Wattenberg, (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 19-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Dalton, R. J. (2007). Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 247-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.009
  24. Dalton, R. J. & Weldon, S. (2007). Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Party Politics, 13(2), 179-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073856
  25. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorat. Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine). Working Paper, n.º 04-11, 2004. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7gz6t2bb
  26. De Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G. & Semetko, H. A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384934
  27. Dimitrova, D. V. & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Election news in Sweden and the United States: A comparative study of sources and media frames. Journalism, 13(5), 604-619.
  28. Dimitrova, D. V. & Kostadinova, P. (2013). Identifying antecedents of the strategic game frame: A longitudinal analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012468739
  29. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  30. Drew, D. & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300103
  31. Effing, R., Van Hillegersberg, J. & Huibers, T. W. C. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), ePart 2011, LNCS 6847 (pp. 25-35). Delft: International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP).
  32. Ellison, N. B. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  33. Eveland, W. P. Jr, & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
  34. Fan, D. P. & Tims, A. R. (1989). The impact of the news media on public opinion: American presidential election 1987-1988. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(2), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/1.2.151
  35. Franklin, C. (1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 14(3), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991982
  36. Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/41473/frontmatter/9780521541473_frontmatter.pdf
  37. Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D. & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal. Applied Economics, 1(2), 35-52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25760159
  38. Gibson, R. (2010). Open source campaigning? UK party organizations and the use of the new media in the 2010 general election. Paper for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September, 2-5.
  39. Greengard, S. (2009). The first internet president. Communications of the ACM, 52(2), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1461928.1461935
  40. Hall, S. (1992). What is “black” in popular culture? In A. G. Raiford & C.Zaragoza (Eds), Popular culture: A reader (pp. 21-33). London: Sage Publications.
  41. Hall, S. (1996). ¿Quién necesita identidad? [Who needs identity?]. In S. Hall & P. Dugay, (Eds.), Cuestiones de identidad cultural [Cultural identity issues] (pp. 1-17). Madrid: Amorrortu.
  42. Haug, M. (2004). Do campaigns really change behavior? New understanding of the behavioral effects of advertising, political campaigns and health communication campaigns. NORDICOM Review, 25(1-2), 277-290. Retrieved from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/kapitel-pdf/157_277-290.pdf
  43. Heath, A., Jowell, R. & Curtice, J. (1985). How Britain votes. Oxford: Pergamon.
  44. Hochschild, J. L. (2010). If democracies need informed voters, how can they thrive while expanding enfranchisement? Election Law Journal: Rules. Politics and Policy, 9(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2009.0055
  45. Inglehart, R. & Klingemann H.D. (1976). Party identification, ideological preference and the left-right dimension among Western mass publics. In I. Budge, I. Crewe & D. Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. Representations of voting and party competition (pp. 243-274). Colchester, UK: ECPR [European Consortium for Political Research] Press.
  46. Iyengar, S. & Simon, A. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 49-169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.149
  47. Jennings, M. K. & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311-334. https://doi.org/10.1086/376947
  48. Karahasanovi, A. & Brandtzæg, P. (2009). Co-creation and user-generated content-elderly people’s user requirements. Computers in Human, 25(3), 655-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.012
  49. Kenski, K. & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
  50. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Communication and opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 167-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.167
  51. Kleinnijenhuis, J. & Fan, D. P. (1999). Media coverage and the flow of voters in multiparty systems: The 1994 national elections in Holland and Germany. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(3), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.3.233
  52. Lalbot, D. (2008). How Obama really did it: The social-networking strategy that took an obscure senator to the doors of the White House. Technology Review, 2008, 9/10.
  53. Lancaster, T. D. & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1986). The Spanish voter: Tradition, economics, ideology. Journal of Politics, 48(3), 648-74.
  54. Latinobarómetro, Corporación (2010). Latinobarómetro Surveys, Ref. LAC_2010_LBS_v01_M. Dataset. Retrieved from http://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp
  55. Lawson, C. (2002). Building the fourth estate: Democratization and the rise of a free press in Mexico. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  56. Lawson, C. & McCann, J. A. (2005). Television news, Mexico’s 2000 elections and media effects in emerging democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000013
  57. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
  58. Lee, E. J. & Shin, S. Y. (2012). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians’ Twitter communication. Communication Research, 41(8), 1088-1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466407
  59. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1988). Economics and elections: The major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  60. Lijphart, A. (1981). Conflict and coexistence in Belgium: The dynamics of a culturally divided society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  61. Linz, J.J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Toward consolidated democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0031
  62. Lippman, W. (1992). Public opinion. New York: Penguin.
  63. Lupia, A. & McCubbins, M.D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Lutz, M. (2009). The social pulpit. Barack Obama’s social media toolkit. Edelman. Retrieved from https://cyber.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.harvard.edu/files/Social%20Pulpit%20-%20Barack%20Obamas%20Social%20Media%20Toolkit%201.09.pdf
  65. Martínez, F. J. (2011). La televisión responde: la legislación electoral vs información política [Television responds: electoral legislation vs. policy information]. In C. Muñiz (Ed.), Comunicación, política y ciudadanía: Aportaciones actuales al estudio de la comunicación política [Communication, politics and citizenship: current contributions to the study of political communication] (pp. 175-197). Mexico City: Fontamara.
  66. Matthes, J. (2012). Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324
  67. McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219806
  68. McCombs, M. & Valenzuela, S. (2007). The agenda-setting theory. Cuadernos de Información, 20(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.20.111
  69. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., López-Escobar, E. & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703-717. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404
  70. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (1996). Trajectories of fear and hope: Support for democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 28(4), 553-581. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.535.9361&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  71. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2007). Generation, age and time: The dynamics of learning during Russia’s transformation. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 822-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00283.x
  72. Montero, M. D. (2009). Political e-mobilisation and participation in the election campaigns of Ségolène Royal (2007) and Barack Obama (2008). Quaderns del CAC, 33, 27-34. Retrieved from http://www.cac.cat/pfw_files/cma/recerca/quaderns_cac/q33_montero_en.pdf
  73. Muñiz, C. (2012). Creando ciudadanos comprometidos. Aportación de los hábitos comunicativos al desarrollo de la sofisticación política entre los jóvenes [Creating engaged citizens. Contribution of communicative habits to the development of the political sophistication among young people]. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, (12), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2012.12.41349
  74. Neundorf, A. (2010). The post-socialist citizen adjusting to a new political system. Doctoral Dissertation. Colchester: University of Essex.
  75. Nie, N., Junn, J. & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  76. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing political activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  77. Panagopoulos, C., Gueorguieva, V., Slotnick, A., Gulati, G. & Williams, C. (2009). Politicking online: The transformation of elections campaign communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Press.
  78. Pande, R. (2011). Can informed voters enforce better governance? Experiments in low-income democracies. Annual Review of Economics, 3(1), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080154
  79. Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  80. Park, N., Kee, K. & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
  81. Pettie, C., Syed, P. & Whiteley, P. (2004). Citizenship in Britain: Values, participation and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  82. Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  83. Price V., Cappella J. N. & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506
  84. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
  85. Ramírez, M. M. (2005). Las campañas presidenciales en México: entre la estabilidad y el cambio político [Presidential campaigns in Mexico: between stability and political change]. El Cotidiano, (133), 7-14. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/325/32513302.pdf
  86. Rinke, E. M., Wessler, H., Lob, C. & Weinmann, C. (2013). Deliberative qualities of generic news frames: Assessing the democratic value of strategic game and contestation framing in election campaign coverage. Political Communication, 30(3), 474-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737432
  87. Robertson, S., Ravi, V. & Medina, R. (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Information Polity, 15(1-2), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0196
  88. Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
  89. Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N. & Verba, S. (1994). Gender and the pathways to participation: The role of resources. The Journal of Politics, 56(4), 963-990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132069
  90. Schuck, A., Boomgaarden, H. G. & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Cynics all around? The impact of election news on political cynicism in comparative perspective. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12023
  91. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P. Jr, & Kwak, N. (2005). Information expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531-565.
  92. Shaw, D. R. (1999). The impact of news media favorability and candidate events in presidential campaigns. Political Communication, 16(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198721
  93. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A. & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice. Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  94. Stevenson, R. L. (2002). Comments on ‘A matter of guilt or innocence’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 453-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.4.453
  95. Stieglitz, S. & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
  96. Temkin, B., Solano, S. & Del Tronco, J. (2008). Explorando el “apartidismo” en México: ¿apartidistas o apolíticos? [Exploring ‘apartisanship’ in Mexico: ¿Apartisans or apoliticals?]. América Latina Hoy, (50),119-145. Retrieved from http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/1344
  97. Tian, Y. (2006). Political use and the perceived effects the internet: A case study of the 2004 election. Communication Research Reports, 23(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090600669103
  98. Tomai, M., Rosa, V., Ella, M., Acunti, A. D., Benedetti, M. & Francescato, D. (2010). Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students. Computers & Education, 54(1), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.009
  99. Trejo, R. (2000). El imperio del marketing político. Cuando las imágenes desplazan a las ideas [The empire of the political marketing. When the images displace ideas]. América Latina Hoy, (25), 15-22. Retrieved from http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/2642/2683
  100. Uhlaner, C. (1989). Rational turnout. The neglected role of groups. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 390-422. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111153
  101. Valenzuela, S., Park, N. & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  102. Van der Eijk, C. & Niemöller, B., (1983). Electoral change in the Netherlands. Empirical results and methods of measurement. Amsterdam: CT Press.
  103. Verba, S. & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper and Row.
  104. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  105. Wattenberg, M. (2003). Where have all the voters gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  106. Weaver, D. & Drew, D. (2001). Voter learning and interest in the 2000 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300103
  107. Williams, R. (2009). Marxismo y literatura [Marxism and literature]. Buenos Aires: Las Cuarenta.
  108. Willnat, L., Wong, W. J., Tamam, E. & Aw, A. (2013). Online media and political participation: The case of Malaysia. Mass Communication & Society, 16(4), 557-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.734891
  109. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  110. Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
  111. Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cut off criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. PhD dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.
  112. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  113. Zhang, W. & Seltzer, T. (2010). Another piece of the puzzle: Advancing social capital theory by examining the effect of political party relationship quality on political and civic participation. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4(3), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180903415954


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.